Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

British school bans short skirts

June 23rd 2010 13:13
school mini-skirt, st aidans

VYOOS EDITORIAL

A British school has banned teenage girls from wearing skirts.

St Aidan's Church of England High School in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, has decreed that all girls aged 15 and younger must from now on wear trousers.


The reason given by the school is that it wishes to save the girls from attracting unwanted attention. “Very young children, and even more disturbingly, special needs children are clearly wholly unaware of the signals they are giving out,'' it said in a statement

We wish to inform St Aidan’s School that the attention is not unwanted. It is entirely wanted. We would also like to notify St Aidans that becoming aware of the signals sent out by our actions is a crucial part of growing up.

Short skirts were shocking in the early 1960s. They have been part of the fashionscape ever since. That one group of teachers in a small town in Yorkshire should decide to impose a minority, blinkered view and say short skirts are unacceptable is to fly in the face of 50 years of conventional western acceptance.

More important, however, is finding the balance between tolerance and guidance in dealing with teenagers.

The school is saying it doesn’t like the decisions its teenagers are making. It is missing the point that all decisions have repercussions, and we all learn from those repercussions. It’s a fundamental of life in a community. That process is more important for teenagers than any other age group. They stand on the threshold of adulthood, and it is crucial that they be given the freedom, within the relative safety of their home and school environments, to interact with the world and, thereby, learn what works and what doesn’t.


Schools are for learning. If teenagers can not learn there how to think for themselves, they will have to learn later in a less-forgiving environment.
news.com.au
227
Vote
   


Celebrity pickings

June 8th 2010 05:47
sarah ferguson duchess of york

VYOOS EDITORIAL

As the dust was settling recently on Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, and the revelation that she had been caught in a tabloid sting offering to sell access to her former husband, Prince Andrew, for 500,000 pounds, she knew she had to do something.

Essentially, she had two choices.

The first was to get into a huddle with her coterie and map out a damage control plan. The usual celebrity thing: remorse, sob story, hint of depression. A friend in need is a plus. Grains of truth here and there are helpful. Real tears are a bonus if you're good enough to squeeze them out on cue.

The plan is to let people see you are human. If you get some actual sympathy, that's nice, but the real purpose of the plan is to complicate the picture with a colourful panorama of personal tribulations upon which people can focus, in the same way they enjoy focusing on train wrecks.

And so you deflect attention, with some small embarrassments, from the big embarrassment.

Fergie will have amongst her group of hangers-on some who are expert in the strategy of confession. Done well enough, they will know, it can generate significant media interest of its own, and where there's media interest, there is income generation potential.

Delighted to offer 24-hour photographic exclusivity. For a consideration.

This is the choice, as we all know, that Fergie made. No surprise there. And the cornerstone of the plan was an appearance on Oprah Winfrey's couch. Lights, camera, tears. Thanks
Fergie, have to run now and check the ratings figures.

Of course, there are drawbacks with this damage control strategy. A big one is that Joe and Josephine Public have an annoying habit of, at times, not buying the story. A second is that the media is absolutely, consummately, unabashedly two-faced. You can bask one day, and boil the next.

The Duchess, it seems, struck out this time on both counts. It has been reported that pretty much every media organisation with an internet presence and a public comments facility has been inundated with fuming Joes and Josephines who were very unimpressed with the Oprah performance.

"I found it painful to watch," wrote one.

"I did not feel that she was sincere and I felt that she was on a mission to save her public identity and the proceeds that come from such," wrote another.

"Everyone is talking about poor Sarah and her scandal," said a third. "Talk is money.
She was in NYC last week at the Book Expo promoting her children's book. Hmm, will sales go up or down?''

Ouch.

Perhaps the hardest hits were those who accused Sarah of copying Lady Diana, Princess of Wales, who had her own confessional on British TV's Panorama show at the height of her marriage woes.

And Fergie found no mercy from the world's media either. Take that uppity New York Times television reviewer Alessandra Stanley, who described Fergie's Oprah appearance as the "ritual of repentance and renewal that these celebrity makeovers require''.

Stanley added, "She is gaming the system, and Oprah is the first and obligatory step in reputation repair."

We mentioned earlier that Fergie had a second option. That option was to say, "Look, I'm sorry. I have behaved like an idiot, and I need to take a long hard look at myself."

Nah. No profit in that.
dailymail.co.uk, news.com.au


126
Vote
   


Should we abolish daylight saving?

April 4th 2010 20:28
daylight saving

VYOOS EDITORIAL
The debate about daylight saving seems to reappear every six months. Go figure.

In the past week or two, as northern hemisphere citizens go through the annual vexation of losing an hour's sleep, and southern hemisphere citizens enjoy the annual luxury of an extra hour's slumber, an American scientist has called for the abolition of daylight saving because, he claims, it does not achieve what it is supposed to achieve.

Dr Hendrick Wolff headed a team of University of California scientists which studied the effect of daylight saving on energy consumption.

They took advantage of an unusual situation in Indiana where, until 2006, only 15 of its 92 counties swapped to daylight saving. If you wanted to know the time in Indiana, you needed GPS.

From 2006, however, State authorities decided to present a unified clock, all 92 counties switching to daylight saving. This created an opportunity, by comparing energy consumption patterns before and after, to see if daylight saving saved energy.

It didn't. In fact, the study showed power use increased in the counties adopting summer time for the first time in 2006, adding about US$8 million to household electricity bills.

"Daylight saving does not save energy,'' Dr Wolff said. "If society wants to keep daylight saving time we need to have better arguments, as the old energy story doesn't work anymore.''

The old energy story? Dr Wolff's assumption that daylight saving is an energy issue is arguable. It's a lifestyle issue. It's about having an extra hour of daylight in summer to play with the kids in the backyard. Or do some gardening. Or drink beer. It's about the community's deep sense of satisfaction, once a year, when we get an extra hour in bed.

An Australian scientist, Professor Michael Polonsky, of Deakin University, was also perplexed by the Wolff study, suggesting energy conservation was never the aim. It was important to remember, Polonsky said, that air-conditioners were not in widespread use when daylight saving became popular in the 1970s.

It was a social initiative, Prof Polonksy says, and from that perspective, daylight saving had too many benefits to abolish it. "The social phenomenon has been valuable and I think, to get rid of it, would be a hard change,'' he said.


116
Vote
   


Ricky Martin is a tabloid gay

April 3rd 2010 05:17
ricky martin

VYOOS EDITORIAL
The main news stories around the world on Monday, March 29, were the terrorist attacks on the Moscow subway, a surprise visit by the US president to Afghanistan, and the announcement by Ricky Martin that he is gay


[ Click here to read more ]
184
Vote
   


Doctor, doctor on the wall

March 30th 2010 10:13
future

VYOOS EDITORIAL
In 10 years, according to a British forecast, some important functions of your family doctor will be taken over by your bathroom mirror


[ Click here to read more ]
68
Vote
   


Oh boy, Billy Slater

March 23rd 2010 02:51
billy slater

VYOOS EDITORIAL
There is an impression, reading the comments and opinions about Billy Slater's sledge on Saturday, that there are two distinct codes of thinking here


[ Click here to read more ]
56
Vote
   


constance mcmillen lesbian tuxedo
Constance McMillen

VYOOS EDITORIAL
We all have decisions to make in life, and the decisions we make define us


[ Click here to read more ]
72
Vote
   


VYOOS EDITORIAL
Sometimes, the best decisions in law are innovative moments of colour splashed on grey areas of inefficacy.

[ Click here to read more ]
57
Vote
   


Are the Academy Awards sexist?

March 6th 2010 21:58
oscar

VYOOS EDITORIAL
The Academy awards are sexist because the Best Actor Awards are separated into genders. We don't have separate Best Actor awards for black and white actors, so why should we have them for men and women


[ Click here to read more ]
78
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

11039 Vote(s)
758 Comment(s)
121 Post(s)
4344 Vote(s)
33 Comment(s)
39 Post(s)
5567 Vote(s)
199 Comment(s)
73 Post(s)
3764 Vote(s)
208 Comment(s)
44 Post(s)
16240 Vote(s)
1597 Comment(s)
243 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]