Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
: Vyoos news
tony abbott

The Australian Broadcasting Commission today aired a "report" that Australian Opposition leader Tony Abbott had been overheard in a party room conversation questioning the decision of the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, to accept an invitation to the forthcoming wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton.


The acceptance, Abbott reportedly opined, was surprising from someone who is an unmarried Republican.

Let us note firstly that it is not certain that Tony Abbott said this.

Let us note secondly that it doesn't matter whether Abbott said it or not. The fact is that his track record makes it likely he did say it, not because he believes it, but because it makes political mileage. The fact is that if you want a politician ruthless enough to arrange a leak to the press of something he "might" have said in the party room, then Tony's your man.

Let us say thirdly that Julia Gillard is the Prime Minister of Australia and will be attending the wedding in that capacity. It would have been unthinkable for her not to be invited. It would have been equally unthinkable for her not to have accepted.

Abbott won't be going. Gillard will be going. She won't be sending Abbott a post card.

And let us say finally that there is often a fine line between ruthlessness and recklessness.
Image: Nicholson







47
Vote
   


Another Latham grotesquerie

February 4th 2011 05:53
: Vyoos news
mark latham

VYOOS EDITORIAL
Former Australian Labor Party leader and Prime Minister wannabe Mark Latham says incumbent Prime Minister Julia Gillard is incapable of empathy because she has no children.

Writing in a magazine column, Latham said Gillard comes across as wooden talking to the public because she chose a life without kids.

This is not an honest opinion. It is the sort of tabloid headline-grabbing, sensationalist sewage which people like Latham rely on to make a buck.

Having famously failed at a real job, they get a peroxided agent and a botoxed publicist and proceed to play the tabloid celebrity game. What you do is bad-mouth people and take extravagantly opinionated stands on any issue which suits your purpose, and watch the offers come in to appear on mindless TV reality, talkback and tabloid affairs shows.

Having your thoughts ghost-written for the redneck press and your (paid-for) picture appear in the front cover of supermarket shock sheets are the next step up the slimy slope.

It's a living. If you're outrageous enough, you can create your own cult. Think Sarah Palin.

Common sense and carefully considered opinion have no place in this game. Snipe, gripe and shoot from the lip. Hit hard, and as far below the belt as you can reach, before running to the next make-up call, via the bank.

It's like the bad loser on a football field, the guy whose side's getting beaten so he gets defensively angry. Nothing is his fault.

Gillard is a winner in the political game at which Latham proved a blundering no-hoper. Look at the scoreboard, Mark.
news.com.au




31
Vote
   


Lolly pops and violent video games

November 3rd 2010 08:14
: Vyoos news
video game violence

VYOOS EDITORIAL
They are trying to make the sale of video games containing graphic violence illegal in California to people under 18.

Plenty of people are pushing the process, saying kids of all ages play video games these days and who in their right mind could be comfortable with a legal system which condones eight-year-olds having unfettered access to games which contain violence?

Who could dispute that?

Well, one group which is isn't convinced, and which is putting up some interesting counter-arguments, is the judges who comprise the United States Supreme Court.

They don't like the "vagueness" of the proposed California law, which sounds like something which can be discussed and addressed. But secondly, and much more crucially, they fear the law conflicts with the First Amendment's protection of free speech.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it this way, "If you are supposing a category of violent materials dangerous to children, then how do you cut it off at video games?''

Justice Antonin Scalia said, "You're asking us to create ... a whole new prohibition which the American people never, never ratified when they ratified the First Amendment.''

What the judges are concerned about is an apparent free speech double-standard, in that the California law appears to limit violent video games while ignoring the violence minors experience in other media such as online, in movies, in music and in books.

Justice Scalia repeated a crucial point: many children's books use violence to demonstrate that being bad doesn't pay. "Some of Grimm's Fairy Tales are quite grim, to tell you the truth,'' Scalia remarked.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed to a study said that watching a Bugs Bunny cartoon had the same effect on minors that playing a violent video game did.

"So can the legislature now, because it has that study, say we can outlaw Bugs Bunny?'' she asked.

Think also comic books. Think kapow! Think comeuppance factor.

As often is the case with these debates, there can be legal, political or social mandates on both sides, and common sense can get squeezed out the back door.

There aren't enough headlines in common sense.

So let's let common sense have a say here. Is it common sense to leave violent video games around for kids to find? Of course it isn't.

Is it common sense to think kids will access violent video games despite the best efforts of parents, teachers, politicians and police to prevent them doing so. Of course it is. The more you hide something, the more attrractive it becomes.

Is it common sense to do everything you can, including legal imperatives, to ensure that any underage kid can not access violent video games? No, it isn't.

Apart from the legal arguments above (and in the US anything that might compromise the First Amendment is a very serious legal argument indeed), and apart from political self-agendas from the Our Kids Are Pure and Sacred lobby, one has to ask what a law banning access by minors to violent video games would achieve.

It certainly won't prevent access by minors to violent video games. The games will still be out there, legally accessible by parents, older siblings, and anyone with an internet connection who knows where to find free copies on the net. Which is, like, you know, every teenager.

Then there's the life lesson argument. If this law is passed, and we somehow effectively prevent every individual viewing video violence until the day they turn 18, we are going to have some shocked and shaken 18-year-olds walking around. Is this the way to prepare kids for the rigours of the real world?

Kids are tougher than many people give them credit for, and they need to be. Surely it is common sense to let them learn some of life's harsher, uglier lessons in their time and in their space.

If an eight-year-old is old enough to find a violent video game, he or she is old enough to start learning perspectives associated with it. The first lesson, that the world isn't full of lolly pops and mum can't, in fact, kiss everything better, can be a hard one, but it's better learned sooner rather than later.





57
Vote
   


Australia’s multicultural tomorrow

October 22nd 2010 02:24
: Vyoos news
multculturalism

VYOOS EDITORIAL
I have lost interest in the multiculturalism debate which periodically consumes Australia


[ Click here to read more ]
89
Vote
   


: Alien Ambassador
alien

An emergency meeting of the Intergalactic Outreach Program, Milky Way Department, Minor and Primitive Species Sub-Committee, is "spitting mad" at Planet Earth, Vyoos has learned.

[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


A planet of barbarians

September 18th 2010 08:46
afghan war

During a recent conversation, a friend argued that if there were lots of other sentient beings in the universe, as is commonly supposed, surely they would have visited us. We can dismiss UFO sightings, which are common but useless in that they all stop short of being verifiable. So where are they? Why haven't all these supposedly advanced civilisations answered the radio signals we have been sending into space for years?

[ Click here to read more ]
107
Vote
   


same sex marriage gay equality
VYOOS EDITORIAL
Julia Gillard’s honeymoon period is over. For me at least.

[ Click here to read more ]
245
Vote
   


julia gillard

The news blasting around the world from Australia is that we have a female Prime Minister. At last. New Zealand got one 13 years ago, Britain 31 years ago, Sri Lanka 50 years ago and Egypt 3483 years ago. About the only places in the world yet to elect a female head of state are the United States and the Vatican.

[ Click here to read more ]
155
Vote
   


VYOOS EDITORIAL
Sometimes, the best decisions in law are innovative moments of colour splashed on grey areas of inefficacy.

[ Click here to read more ]
57
Vote
   


Today's news: Google smacks China

January 13th 2010 01:42
google china
Google has accused China of hacking into Gmail accounts, and has threatened to walk out of China as a consequence.

Google has just issued a statement saying it has uncovered a "highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China". The email accounts targeted were those of human rights activists


[ Click here to read more ]
73
Vote
   


Obama gets it right

November 19th 2009 02:09
obama bow

When US President Barack Obama met Japanese Emperor Akihito in Tokyo last week, he both shook hands and bowed.

[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
   


Don't lie to me, Argentina

October 11th 2009 22:09
Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner
President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, for whom freedom of the press has become politically inconvenient

There are two reasons for a national government to introduce legislation establishing ownership and other regulatory controls over the media. The first reason is to prevent monopolies — nobody wants Rupert Murdoch owning everything. The second reason is to muzzle critics of the government.

[ Click here to read more ]
67
Vote
   


Hanging out their dirty Washington

October 1st 2009 23:56
senator john ensign
US Senator John Naughty Boy Ensign

Sex scandals have been around almost as long as politicians, and American Senator John Ensign has just added his name to a long list of parliamentarians who followed elect with erect.

[ Click here to read more ]
42
Vote
   


China's birthday party

September 29th 2009 23:13
china propaganda poster
The art of propaganda. Translation: 'Make art and propaganda one integrated part of the revolutionary mechanism. Use it as a powerful weapon to organise people, educate people, strike the enemy and eliminate the enemy!'

We would like to wish China's Communist Party a happy birthday. But we won't.

[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

10894 Vote(s)
754 Comment(s)
121 Post(s)
4300 Vote(s)
33 Comment(s)
39 Post(s)
5384 Vote(s)
193 Comment(s)
72 Post(s)
3728 Vote(s)
204 Comment(s)
44 Post(s)
15730 Vote(s)
1464 Comment(s)
232 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]