Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Ricky's tricky humour

January 21st 2012 00:02
:  
ricky gervais

I don't understand the whole Golden Globes and Ricky Gervais thing.

In 2010 an English comedian is invited to anchor an American show business awards night, but his jokes are perceived as outrageous insults and the US psychotherapy industry experiences a six-month boom as the slighted celebrities seek solace.


Just as things were returning to normal, with Mel Gibson again able to recite the serenity prayer without a voice quaver, it was announced that the Golden Globe organisers had invited Gervais back to host the 2011 event.

Hollywood shuddered. It registered on the Richter Scale. You could smell the fear. It registered on the sphincter scale.

And Ricky Dene Gervais, born June 25, 1961, himself winner of seven BAFTAs, five British Comedy Awards, two Emmys, three Golden Globes and the 2006 Rose d'Or, delivered.

It was so brutal that America went into shock. They simply had no response to someone who stood before an audience of Hollywood elite and, beaming live into the homes of every good citizen who believed in truth, justice and the celebrity way, crucified them.

Not only did he make fun of Charlie Sheen, Bruce Willis and Robert Downey Jr, he even insulted Hugh Hefner!

They hadn't felt like this since Pearl Harbour.

The response, as you would expect from a nation which gave us Superman and The Incredible Hulk, was swift, strong and to the point. After they had woken the next day and downed some stuff to treat the hangover, and some more stuff to treat the fact that they had woken up at all, Hollywood fought back.


Ricky Gervais, they said, would never shove humble pie, or whatever it was he was peddling, down our throats in our town again. Ever.

It took several months for the outrage to abate, and for the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which runs the Golden Globe Awards, to invite Mr Gervais back to host the 2012 awards.

Huh? Am I the only one confused here?

George Bernard Shaw once said, "England and America are two countries separated by a common language." It means that there are some fundamental differences in the way they use English.

Take, for example, the concept of irony. In the UK, there is a fine line between irony and sarcasm, and yet British history is rich with comedians who have danced on that line and royally entertained us as they did so.

In the US, however, the line is a thick one and tends more to divide slapstick and sarcasm, and the line itself is a no-go zone. Subtlety, paradox and (worst of all) irony are not the currency of Hollywood. Motto: In Charlie Chaplin, Abbott and Costello and The Three Stooges We Trust.

What do you expect of the inventors of canned laughter?

Gervais's infra dig humour at the 2010 and 2011 Golden Globe Awards crossed a cultural divide which was already entrenched 100 years ago in Bernard Shaw's day. No wonder they were baying for his blood, and that of the misled morons who run the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.

Why on earth would they invite him back a second time, let alone a third?

Ratings.

Showbiz awards ceremonies, including the Oscars, have been falling from grace for some years. Not enough reality perhaps, but whatever the reason, the Golden Globes was experiencing an annual decline of interest along with the rest of them, an industry-wide trend which appeared cyclical and irresistible.

Until Ricky Gervais lobbed in 2010 and made tabloid headlines throughout the known universe. Yes, that's why they invited him back in 2011 for a repeat dose. Ratings.

And that's why they invited him back for the 2012 event last weekend. Except, this time, all his insults had the power of a powder puff. All titter, no terror. Just when he was bringing to Hollywood a sea change, a new understanding, a sweeping vision of comedic nuance as perfected and performed by Brits since the time of Chaucer, Gervais went lame and became a Hollywood local.

I don't know why. I just don't understand the whole Golden Globes and Ricky Gervais thing.
Ricky Gervais picture: Finlay MacKay, Time Magazine. An abbreviated version of this article first appeared in mX newspaper in Australia.

19
Vote
   


The questionable Australian accent

March 4th 2011 02:49
: Vyoos news
let stalk strine

VYOOS EDITORIAL
In the news this week was a story which rated the Australian accent the world's fifth sexist. It's a safe bet there were no Aussies on the voting panel. I know no fellow Australians with particular affection for our accent. We call it Strine, which sums up the nasal twang which characterises our speech.

World's fifth-sexiest? Sexiness, it seems, is in the ear of the beholder.

It brought to mind a magazine article I read last week which quoted an Englishman describing the Australian accent as one which turns all statements into questions.

As anyone who has been in the country recently will know, this is now the accepted way of speaking in Australia. You can hear politicians, academics, TV show hosts and every 20-something in the land putting an upward inflexion on just about every sentence. I have no doubt that chief executive officers, civil celebrants, nuns, kangaroos, koalas and dingoes have adopted the habit.

It's a habit I am in a unique position to hate.

My position is that I left Australia 20 years ago, when Aussies did not speak this way, to live overseas. Sometime between then and four years ago when I returned, most spoken Aussie statements became questions. It's a major upheaval in Ocker culture. I'm still dealing with the shock. It's just not my lingo any more.

At least I have always been able to seek consolation in the written form of the language. It has always been my favourite form, perhaps because it is more difficult to corrupt.

Enter David Meagher, Editor of wish magazine, a hugely glossy insert in The Australian newspaper and so cool it doesn't use a capital letter in its name. Or is that retro-cool? Surely the gimmick has been around so long it's cliched.

Anyway, Mr Meagher has on Page 14 of today's issue a column in his name which starts: "There is something about London that seems to allow creativity to flourish. Maybe it's the weather that keeps people indoors with their thinking caps on? Or maybe it's something more ingrained in the city's culture?"

Did you spot the Aussie accent in Meagher's writing? Yes, the question marks on the second and third sentences - sentences which aren't questions.

It's spreading. It's another cane toad.

Stop it. Despite what they say overseas, it's not sexy.


68
Vote
   


China's committee work-around

December 22nd 2010 02:05
: Vyoos news
committee meeting
'I have a question: what are we talking about?'

Chinese authorities have announced a ban on the use of foreign words in the media and state press. The ban, they say, addresses a need to end an erosion of the purity of Chinese language.

The ban, I say, proves that Chinese committees produce the same brain-dead nonsense as their counterparts in the rest of the world.

In practice, the Chinese decision will work. Neither privatised nor state-owned media will have any concerns about following the edict, because they won't have to change anything to comply. English words do not make it into written Chinese, in the way they make it into written Italian or Norwegian, for example, because Chinese publishing systems are not set up to handle alphabet-based characters. Further, although many mainland Chinese these days might understand some English words popularised through the internet (mainstream English words such as thanx, LOL and porn), few would recognise their written form.

The Chinese decision works in principle, as well, in the same way that xenophobic, politically self-serving propaganda works. The authorities pronounce it; the workers ignore it.

For this reason we can see that, while committee meetings in China are just as full of hot air and devoid of common sense as committee meetings anywhere else, the trappings of totalitarianism remain sufficiently evident that foolish edicts can be treated as such. This makes Chinese committee decisions much less dangerous than elsewhere, a fact which has enormous benefits for the economy, for due process and for individual freedom.

This capacity to take the decisions of committees out of real-time processes lifts the efficiency rating across all Chinese sectors well above anything seen in more backward and underprivileged countries, such as the United States, where people still live in hope of committees producing something useful.

41
Vote
   


In a prickle

October 19th 2010 00:38
: vyoos nyoos
brice hortefeux
Brice Hortefeux: "I said WHAT?"
In French, empreintes digitales means a database of finger prints, and empreintes genetiques is a database of DNA records.

They are terms with which the country's Interior Minister, Brice Hortefeux, is familiar


[ Click here to read more ]
132
Vote
   


The battle to save a language

March 12th 2010 04:25
welsh language sign
Languages, like plant and animal species, can become extinct, a fact about which a lot of people care.

Well, so we thought


[ Click here to read more ]
66
Vote
   


William Safire, 1929-2009

September 27th 2009 23:39
william safire
William Safire receives the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2006

William Lewis Safire, Pulitzer Prize winner, language expert, long-time columnist for The New York Times and speech writer for President Nixon, has died at the age of 79. The Baltimore Sun newspaper described him as a conservative columnist and word warrior who feared no politician or corner of the English language.

[ Click here to read more ]
29
Vote
   


Family's Fielding fluffs his fiscal

September 9th 2009 02:51
mary whitehouse
Mary Whitehouse: at least she could spell

Australian Senator Steve Fielding is apparently taking, as his yardstick for political performance, the career of former American vice-president Dan Quayle. Fielding is paying particular attention to Quayle's inability to spell.

[ Click here to read more ]
50
Vote
   


George W Bush, who in 2000 started his forceful march to the US presidency by asking, "Is our children learning", leaves the public stage shortly, which is sad because he will now have fewer opportunities to mangle the language.

Debate may rage forever over relative merit of the gaffs which have come to be known collectively as Bushisms, but The Global Language Monitor, an organisation which tracks language trends, has just published its Top 15 list of Bushisms, and coming out on top is "misunderestimate


[ Click here to read more ]
63
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

10894 Vote(s)
754 Comment(s)
121 Post(s)
4300 Vote(s)
33 Comment(s)
39 Post(s)
5384 Vote(s)
193 Comment(s)
72 Post(s)
3728 Vote(s)
204 Comment(s)
44 Post(s)
15730 Vote(s)
1464 Comment(s)
232 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]