Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Testosterone crisis

February 18th 2009 18:44
testosterone levels

Global levels of testosterone may be falling as a result of the economic crisis.

Ironically, investment bankers, who refused to return from lunch at this news because testosterone is not traded on global commodity markets, may be most at risk.


Dr Richard Petty, medical director at a men's health clinic in London, says chronic stress caused by redundancy, financial worries or working longer hours can reduce levels of the hormone.

Testosterone, the hormone produced by the testicles, triggers the development of male sexual characteristics, such as the lust for money.

"When a man becomes grumpy or irritable, it's easy to blame work or simply the effects of ageing,'' Dr Petty said.

"In the short-term, stress can increase levels of testosterone and this is useful to help people respond quickly to pressures and new situations. But chronic stress, which is ongoing, is a major factor in the decline of testosterone."

Testosterone levels - and all investment bankers reading this should pay special attention here - can be raised in several ways. First, try exercise and weight loss (talk to your doctor or counsellor if you do not understand these terms). Also try a balanced diet, get more sleep and have more sex.
news.com, fitness.suite101.com. image: www.coachmefit.com


65
Vote
   


Time to grab some NAB shares

July 27th 2008 08:22
John Stewart
NAB CEO John Stewart, who is 'a rare blend. He is as engaging and entertaining as he is effective' - according to The Australian, July 26, 2008


It was a bad day on Friday for National Australia Bank, its management and its shareholders, all of whom took a hammering. And now, while the media ask questions about competency and transparency, while institutional investors and analysts work over the weekend adjusting their financial models, and while mums and dads who haven't baled out yet consider whether to do so, I suggest you and I let them all get on with their finger-pointing and number-nudging and nail-chewing and quietly buy a few NAB shares as soon as the stock market opens tomorrow.


In case you missed the news, the NAB share price was savaged by investors on Friday after the bank announced a provision of A$830m against its portfolio of collateralised debt obligations. The portfolio effectively represents NAB's exposure to the US home lending crisis, and following a provision of $181m in the previous reporting period, NAB has now written off A$1.01 billion of the portfolio's total value of $1.2 billion.

Friday, in fact, was the end of an ordinary week for NAB. On Tuesday it announced its withdrawal from negotiations to buy the Australian operations of investment bank ABN Amro. On Thursday it announced a $200 million bond deal which should have been positive except that, come Friday, investors were screaming that it was unfair to push a bond deal one day and release major bad news the next.

That's a fair accusation, and this article is not about to suggest that NAB has gone out of its way to behave with flawless virtue and honour. Retail banks don't tend to behave that way.

What I would like to say is that NAB has behaved pretty much exactly the way one would expect a major retail bank to behave in the circumstances, except it has arguably been a little more cautious and prudent than most. And caution and prudence are very much something the market and shareholders expect of their big banks.

What NAB has actually been guilty of is making a conservative accounting decision. It is convinced the US prime loan situation - something entirely out of its control - will deteriorate further, and it has made prudent adjustments to its earnings forecasts.

The worst that can be said is that the announcement came as a surprise to shareholders and to the market, but such announcements invariably are and it is difficult to see how NAB could have handled it any differently. Or, indeed, why it should have.

The best that can be said - and as far as I can tell, this is the only attempt to put the affair in a positive light that you will see anywhere this weekend - is that NAB has virtually wiped its exposure to the US sub-prime crisis. That it has done so early and aggressively leaves it open to questions of why, but now one of two things will happen. One, NAB's fears about US mortgages will be realised, and the value of its portfolio will indeed tumble, and eventually people will reverse the criticism and ask other big banks why they didn't have the foresight of the NAB. Or, second, the sub-prime crisis will stabilise and the value of NAB's portfolio (which continues to pay interest and which has lost only 2% of real value so far) will not fall through the floor and NAB will have a few hundred million, perhaps even $1 billion, sloshing around.

Financial institutions have to invest funds, and just like you and me they have to spread things a bit in the name of risk management. Given the scope of NAB's activities, it is to be expected that some investments will outperform expectations and some will underperform. And as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, some will fail, occasionally spectacularly.

NAB's surprise writedown of almost $1 billion sounds big, but it in no way threatens the stability of the bank (if it did, NAB would not have had the confidence to make the announcement in this way). NAB will still announce a profit for the current quarter and the dividend is not expected to be affected.

Even if the mortgage portfolio does become worthless, this will, in time, be just another blip on the balance sheet. NAB will continue doing business in a prudent, cautious and less than flawlessly transparent manner, just as its shareholders like it.

And the share price will recover the 13.5% it lost on Friday. It may go down further first, and it may take a few days or even longer to recover fully. But it may also bounce back first thing Monday. Get in quick if you don't want to miss out.

52
Vote
   


Investing in gold

July 23rd 1999 10:11
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.



All that glitters ...

Many years ago, back in the good old days before the Great Asian Discombob­ulat­ion, Red Inque, young, innocent and newly arrived in Hong Kong from Australia, sat in a restaurant with a beautiful Chinese woman and watched her eat a fish head.

She did it with both dexterity and dain­t­iness, and with a relish which almost, but not quite, convinced Red to try the head.

Finally, the meal was finished. The young woman cleaned her hands, fixed him with her beautiful, almond-shaped eyes, ran her tongue across her lips, and murmured, “Do you think the price of gold will rise soon?”

Red went red, but then launched into a nervous discourse, the content of which owed much more to hoped for rewards of a non-fiscal nature than any great knowledge of the subject.
“Sure,” he blustered. “It’s been depress­ed for so long it must rise soon.”

That was eight years ago. Gold never did get it together, and neither did Red and the Chinese enchantress.

Today, of course, Red is older and wiser, and in the same position he would know to smile urbanely, fix those lovely dark eyes with his own, and murmur a seductive reply along the following lines. Gold is now at US$256 an ounce, a 20-year low and just 30% off its US$850-an-ounce peak in 1980. It has very limited downside from here be­cause:

Gold is now close to the global average cost of mining of US$230 an ounce. If gold fell below the cost of mining, new supply would cease.

For 10 years or more, the world’s banks have been driv­ing down the price of gold by borrowing it from central banks at low interest rates (currently about 1%) and then selling the gold on spot markets to gen­erate funds which can earn much more than 1%. Currently, about 8,000 tonnes of gold are on loan from global central banks to trading banks – a figure which represents 3.1x average annual gold product­ion and continues to grow as banks keep rolling over repayment of the physical gold. Now, as the price approaches its production break-even price, this trend will have to reverse. Once production starts to become unprofitable, output will decline, and central banks’ reserves will become the major source. Once that source starts to run low, trading banks will have no choice, as their gold loans fall due, but to go to the spot markets to buy the commodity. As banks start to cover their short positions, the price of gold will rebound.

Negative sentiment towards the gold price has been generated by the stated intention of the IMF, the Bank of England and Switzerland to sell 2,100 tonnes of gold over the next five years or so. In our view, this will give banks the oppor­tunity to cover part of their gold loans, but it will be insufficient to stem the reversal.

Global gold production has lagged final demand for the past five years, the difference being the lending of central bank re­serves. As we have said, we foresee this lending drying up.
There have always been two main reasons to buy and hoard gold. The first is risk insurance: gold is a hedge against any­thing from economic crisis to Y2K meltdown. The second reason to hold is speculation: precious metals are trading at 20-year lows and are overdue for a significant correction.

All of which is a great reason to read our new report on RNA Holdings (0501.HK). Anyone who doesn’t contact us for a copy needs their head read.
53
Vote
   


Consumer confidence

April 27th 1999 08:50
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

Tell me Dobkins: How long have you been with us – not counting today? -- David Frost (The Sack and How to Give It)

[ Click here to read more ]
35
Vote
   


Technology asset bubble 2

April 22nd 1999 08:20
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

The pig, if I am not mistaken, supplies us sausage, ham and bacon. Let others say his heart is big – I call it stupid of the pig. -- Ogden Nash

[ Click here to read more ]
52
Vote
   


Technology asset bubble 1

February 22nd 1999 04:10
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

It's only when the tide goes out that you learn who's been swimming naked. -- Warren Buffett

[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
   


Bad press

December 7th 1998 03:16
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political, investment and social commentary articles for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor at the time, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, especially in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

Accuracy to a newspaper is what virtue is to a lady; but a newspaper can always print a retraction.-- Adlai Stevenson

[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

8318 Vote(s)
710 Comment(s)
97 Post(s)
515 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
7 Post(s)
2534 Vote(s)
28 Comment(s)
25 Post(s)
3799 Vote(s)
189 Comment(s)
56 Post(s)
2809 Vote(s)
172 Comment(s)
34 Post(s)
10315 Vote(s)
788 Comment(s)
157 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]