Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Ricky Martin is a tabloid gay

April 3rd 2010 05:17
ricky martin

VYOOS EDITORIAL
The main news stories around the world on Monday, March 29, were the terrorist attacks on the Moscow subway, a surprise visit by the US president to Afghanistan, and the announcement by Ricky Martin that he is gay.

Most non-tabloid media rated the first two stories more important, but you wouldn't know it from the astonishment, applause, approbation, anger, angst and airheadedness with which the community greeted the third.


Why all the song and dance? Well, the strident reactions came mostly from America, where conservative, prurient, judgmental, religious conservatism is, like Sarah Palin's glasses, a fashion accessory. America is the world's biggest importer of eggshells, upon which the country's liberal-minded citizens walk.

Admittedly, Martin's announcement was itself less than robustly self-affirming. It came on his web site, as follows: "To keep living as I did up until today would be to indirectly diminish the glow that my kids where born with. Enough is enough. This has to change."

Indirect diminution is not a concept that commonly confronts the fans (or foes) of pop stars, so we will try to clarify. The children to which Martin refers are his twin sons, Matteo and Valentino, who were born in August 2008. So what Ricky is saying is that having children made it clear to him that he was gay.

We hope that's clear.

Of course, Ricky could have said something like "I knew I was gay years ago" but, as his marketing advisers would have pointed out, there is little headline mileage in such banalities. Often, truth isn't sexy.


Also, you don't have the fun of teasing the religious right.



165
Vote
   


Are the Academy Awards sexist?

March 6th 2010 21:58
oscar

VYOOS EDITORIAL
The Academy awards are sexist because the Best Actor Awards are separated into genders. We don't have separate Best Actor awards for black and white actors, so why should we have them for men and women?

This argument for a single-gender Best Actor category at all festivals of film has been put forward by Kim Elsesser, a research scholar at the Center for Study of Women at the University of California, Los Angeles, and has gained prominence this week after Elsesser wrote this article about it in The New York Times.

"Separate is not equal," says Elsesser. "While it is certainly acceptable for sports competitions like the Olympics to have separate events for male and female athletes, the biological differences do not affect acting performances. The divided Oscar categories merely insult women, because they suggest that women would not be victorious if the categories were combined.

The Oscars, she says, have separated male and female actors into two categories to make sure women get their share of the awards spotlight. "In the 21st century women contend with men for titles ranging from the American president to the American Idol. Clearly, there is no reason to still segregate acting Oscars by sex."

Nice try. Sexism is an important issue, and any suggestion of sexism deserves to be met with the full force of objective public scrutiny. Sexism within the ranks of a venerable institution such as the The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is even more headline-worthy. Wait until the week of the Academy Awards to publish your story, and you have done everything possible to maximise the impact of your story.

If you think I am suggesting Elsesser's claim is cynical opportunism, you are right.

At the heart of the argument is the claim that having Best Actor gongs for men and women insults women. Rubbish. How does it insult women? And if it does insult women, why doesn't it insult men too?

Kim Elsesser suggests the actor awards were separated from the beginning (the first Academy Awards were in 1929) because at that time women had only recently won the right to vote and "so perhaps it was reasonable to offer them their own acting awards". Isn't this turning a positive into a negative? And the argument doesn't make sense, because if that were really the Academy's motivation, why didn't it make the directing, screenplay, music, costume etc awards separate too?

The Academy created Best Actor awards for men and women because it was an eminently sensible thing to do. It reflects the fact that the roles of men and women in films, as of course in life, are different. There are naturally different physical and psychological responses to events. There are largely single-gender issues such as motherhood and priesthood. The roles of women and men are as separate in film as they are in the real world which film reflects.

Recognising that does not create inequality.

"Collapsing two major categories into one would have the added value of reducing the length of the awards show, a move that many viewers would laud," says Elsesser towards the end of her article. Some may laud it, but they have the option of going to make a cup of tea if they get bored, or not watching in the first place. For the industry and for the fans, this night of nights can't go long enough, and for them the thought of losing two of the biggest, most drama-filled moments of the Academy Awards is as unthinkable as it is unnecessary.

Ingrid Bergman
Ingrid Bergman won three acting Oscars, but Kim Elsesser says we may have to change that number

68
Vote
   


Elvis impersonators have no standards

January 6th 2009 20:52
elvis presley

It is a regrettable example of under-regulation and we have no idea why Barack Obama did not make it a major campaign issue.

We refer to the surprising lack of standards in the multi-million industry known as "Elvis impersonation". According to a Las Vegas-based agent, all you need to enter the industry is sideburns and a jumpsuit. It should take more than this, says Rob Garrett, to be hailed as The King.

Garrett is a pioneer of the industry and has an impeccable background for it. His credentials include attendance at 23 Elvis Presley (the real one) concerts in the 1970s.

Today he runs what he terms a "tribute artist company", booking Elvis look-a-likes for events. His doppelgängers, he asserts, are the cream of the crop.

But not so amongst his competition, most of which will book "any dude with sideburns and a lip curl”, he says

It is a busy time of year for Garrett with many people seeking impersonators to appear at celebratory events on January 8, Elvis Presley's birthday.

Once the rush is over, Garrett will return to his campaign to introduce some benchmarking and governance to the industry. Before it loses integrity.

www.flashnews.com

59
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

8318 Vote(s)
710 Comment(s)
97 Post(s)
515 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
7 Post(s)
2534 Vote(s)
28 Comment(s)
25 Post(s)
3799 Vote(s)
189 Comment(s)
56 Post(s)
2809 Vote(s)
172 Comment(s)
34 Post(s)
10315 Vote(s)
788 Comment(s)
157 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]