Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Changing Fortune 500

July 12th 2008 10:21
Goodbye Nike, hello China

Hello China indeed. Our heading summarises the 2008 Fortune 500 list, released last Thursday. The iconic sports shoe maker and eight other American companies fell off the list of the world's top 500 companies measured by revenue, cutting the American presence from 162 in 2007 to 153.

Japan provided 64 companies, France 39, Germany 37 and Britain 34.

Splitting the last two, with 35 companies, was greater China. With 26 mainland firms, six from Taiwan and three from Hong Kong, the Chinese presence was the biggest ever, and who can doubt that there is plenty more to come?


Before polishing off the crystal ball and having a peep at the future, it is interesting to have a look at the road, at times rocky and even harsh, which has led to a present where tens if not hundreds of millions of Chinese are wearing expensive western clothes and carrying expensive mobile phones in their designer pockets, and a future where it seems a question of when, not whether, China will take over as the world's economic super power.

Some people argue that China became the world's biggest economy years ago. This is because statistics, as we all know, can tell the same story in different ways. In simple terms, it can be misleading to say the average American earns, say, 10 times as much as the average Chinese, because that average Chinese wage has, in China, a much higher value than one-tenth the American wage. If we adjust the average wage figures to reflect local purchasing power, and if we then multiply our new average wage figures by the respective population of the two countries, it is easy to see how China can be said to be the world's biggest economy.

While it still has a little way to go in real terms, as the economists say, it interesting to consider that China has been the fastest-growing economy in the world for the past 25 years. Average gross domestic product growth in that time has been an astounding 10 per cent. Income levels have grown at 8 per cent per year for the past 30 years, and a 2005 United Nations report said China had lifted 250 million people out of poverty since 1980. Today, new millionaires in US$ terms are popping up all over the place.


It is not all good news, of course. Income disparity - the gap between the rich and the poor - is growing quickly and has been recognised by authoritative voices both inside and outside the country as a major problem. Some predict consequent social unrest unless the Chinese authorities find a way of reversing the trend.

The sheer scope of the Chinese economic revolution could have global consequences. In 2006, renowned American environmentalist Dr Lester Brown warned that China's growing prosperity in China threatened to place "intolerable" burdens on the world's natural resources.

Dr Brown bluntly claimed that, unless the world economy was fundamentally restructured, it would be unable to produce enough energy, food and other resources to meet Chinese demand.

Is this the future? Dr Brown said that, if it continued to grow at its current pace, China would by 2031 have a population of 1.4 billion, would burn 99 million barrels of oil a day (18 per cent more than is now produced globally), consume two-thirds of the world's current grain harvest, use twice as much paper as the world currently produces, and drive 1.1 billion cars, more than the world's 2005 fleet of 800 million, forcing it to pave roads and car parks equal to the area it now plants in rice.

"There go the world's forests," said Dr Brown

Is that the future? Our crystal ball has thrown hands over eyes and hidden itself under the pillow.

Footnote: For a full list of the 2008 Fortune 500, go to this link.

Sources: China Daily, cnn.com, wikipedia.com


30
Vote
Shared on
   


Celtic Tiger

July 8th 2008 10:23
Can someone tell me why European and other developed economies are not following the example of Ireland? I am no economic or political expert, but I don't understand how Ireland can transform itself, as it did, from a European backwater to one of the world's wealthiest nations, and no-one thought it worth emulating. If you do understand, and can shed any light on this, please, please, leave a comment below.

Meanwhile, if you are wondering just what this is all about, and just what Ireland did, let me try to explain.

Ireland, for so long a poor cousin of Europe, underwent a period of startling economic growth, beginning in the early 1990s. The growth was so remarkable that, in 1994, the investment bank Morgan Stanley coined the term "Celtic Tiger" (or Tíogar Ceilteach, as they say locally), a reference to the growth of the Asian Tigers - South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore - in the 1980s and 1990s. The growth has also been referred to as "Ireland's Economic Miracle".

What did Ireland do to become the Tiger of Europe? There has been more debate than consensus on that, which could partly explain the lack of imitation. Commentators have pointed to its adoption of free market principles such as lower corporate tax rates and reduced government spending, and other commentators have said that Ireland was in the right place at the right time to benefit from a low-cost labour market, decades of promoting higher education, and EU membership.

But here is where it gets interesting for me. Many economists credit Ireland's growth to slashing the corporate taxation rate to between 10 and 12.5 percent. Cutting tax for business fat cats is bad, right? Just puts more money in their pockets and puts pressure on income tax rates. Well, not exactly. Cutting corporate tax rates is good for everyone if it stimulates existing businesses and attract new ones.

Did it work? Irish public debt was slashed, consumer spending soared as disposable income jumped to record levels, unemployment fell from 18% in the late 1980s to 3.5% in the early 2000s, and average industrial wages grew at one of the highest rates in Europe. The new wealth resulted in large investments in modernising Irish infrastructure and cities, it resulted in many companies moving to Ireland, and it reversed a long trend of net emigration.

Sounds like an economic miracle alright. And now the Irish are grinning and the rest of Europe continues to struggle with high unemployment and high taxes. Can anyone please tell me why?

46
Vote
Shared on
   


Consumer confidence

April 27th 1999 08:50
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

Tell me Dobkins: How long have you been with us – not counting today? -- David Frost (The Sack and How to Give It)

Posting a recovery

Hong Kong’s most important economic and business confidence indicator hit 70 on Saturday. We are referring, of course, to the number of pages of job advertisements in The South China Morning Post. Back in the good old days, before the Great Asian Myocardial Infarction, the SCMP’s Saturday job ads ran in the high 100s, and for a while there in 1997 it was regularly more than 200 and needed seven folds to present.

Those were the days. The Hong Kong Government used to produce underemployment figures, by sector. The big property developers would line up outside the Legco Building, on their knees, to deliver petitions pleading for more construction workers to be allowed in. There were shortages of people in every white collar area. Accountants and lawyers and analysts would command astronomical wages, and if they didn’t like their job they could always find another, probably at double the wage, in the following Saturday’s Post.

At the time, The South China Morning Post was the most profitable newspaper in the world. Red Inque worked there occasionally, doing casual editing shifts in the business section. One evening the display advertising department rang three times and increased the size of the next day’s section. It had been huge to start. By the end it ran to 24 pages, the most ever. Around 1am, as the paper was being put to bed, the Business Editor announced to the desk that the business section of this one edition of the newspaper was worth HK$17m in advertising revenue. It was a record. We filed out and went to the pub, where we still had to buy our own beer.

But HK$17m was peanuts compared to what those Saturday display ads brought in. Back then, there was a huge picture of the front page of the SCMP splashed on an advertising billboard at the Star Ferry terminal. In the top right corner of the front page, the figure 228 was clearly visible, this being the number of pages of jobs ads that day.

We have no idea how much money 228 pages of job ads represents, but we know it is a lot more than 48 pages, which is what the SCMP got down to a couple of months ago. They stopped putting the number on the front page of the Saturday edition (and about the same time the Star Ferry billboard ad was taken down), but we would check out of interest. It was a weekly reality dose.

And now it is rising again. We cracked the 60 level a couple of weeks ago, and we had 70 on Saturday. The number is even back on the front page, the paper proudly showing how it is going up. We are referring, of course, to confidence.
20
Vote
Shared on
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

1722 Vote(s)
98 Comment(s)
29 Post(s)
401 Vote(s)
22 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)
239 Vote(s)
3 Comment(s)
5 Post(s)
1464 Vote(s)
70 Comment(s)
29 Post(s)
235 Vote(s)
4 Comment(s)
7 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]