Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
wedding dress kovacs
Hannah Kovacs in her $18 wedding dress

In 1991, just before moving overseas to live, I decided to consolidate all my addresses and phone numbers in a new contact book. This item, basically a few blank sheets of paper stuck together with glue, cost me just under A$10. A similar item in an Australian newsagent today will cost a fraction of the price.


How is it that, over the past 20 years, so many things have become so much cheaper?

The reason is that far more consumer products are now imported from China, India, Indonesia and other countries where wages are much lower than Australian wages. The prices we pay for the items produced reflect the lower production costs.

Many argue that this is to the detriment of Australian business and Australian jobs. Others argue that that this is to the benefit of the consumer. Economists and regulators argue that this is about free and fair markets, and reasonable business practice.

Hannah Kovacs is a consumer who stands fairly in the free trade corner. An online poll conducted by Bride to Be magazine in early 2009 estimated the average bride spends A$2,200 on her wedding dress. Kovacs paid A$18.

She's a psychology student at the University of Queensland. The wedding dress industry, like the stationery industry used to be, is notorious for abusing the lack of a competitive market by ripping off consumers. Kovacs was quoted $4,000 for a dress in a Sydney shop. Asked if the dress was made in Australia, the store was at least honest: no, they said, it was made in China.


Kovacs, still paying for tertiary studies, could not afford $4,000 but she got an idea. She went online and researched Chinese garment makers — at the Chinese end. What she found is professionalism, service, quality — and an $18 price tag for the dress of her choice. Postage and insurance brought the total price to $185.

She found the same gown available in an Australia shop. It sells for $1,500.

So do you buy Australian, and get ripped off, or do you buy at fair market value?
news.com.au


54
Vote
   


banker protest

I watched the television news last night and learned that National Australia Bank is to scrap overdue account fees. The decision will cost the bank an estimated A$100 million a year in revenue, but it had decided getting rid of the charge was "a good business decision that will retain customers and attract new ones".

You bet it's a good business decision. Better to do it now, while you can make some promotional mileage out of it, than in a few months after proposed government legislation becomes law and forces you to do it.

As I watched the news report last night, I thought, "It's a start, but it's not enough." These bank fees are a scam. They are amongst the most detested consumer impositions in the market place. Maybe the only thing more hated is automated phone answering systems.

There is no doubt scrapping these fees is opportunistic. There is no mention, you will note, of doing anything about the blight foisted on society by the blood-sucking retail banking credit card business.

"You have a long way to go," I said to my television screen.

Following the news, I watched the Australian Broadcasting Commission's 7.30 Report, without which the world would be a far less tolerable place. They covered the NAB fee-scrapping news too, and had managed to grab a word with the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd.

My Rudd welcomed the decision to scrap overdue account fees, but then said the NAB has "a long way to go".

Something positive from a bank and the PM agrees with me. It was a good news day.



51
Vote
   


Barbie shock and outrage

March 6th 2009 01:55
barbie doll tattoo

The American media is full of the latest moral outrage perpetrated by Mattel, maker of the Barbie doll.

Parents across the nation have been having their moment of fame, appearing on the news services expressing shock and horror that Mattel could do such a thing.

What Mattel has done is announce that one of the Barbie dolls to appear in the new spring range will have tattoos.

There are voices of reason amongst the shrieks of horror, but not many. Voices of reason don't make for compelling seven-second news bites. People should know by now that saying something sensible just ain't the way to get yourself on television.

The real story is that the new "Totally Stylin' Tattoos Barbie" comes with a set of body art stickers and a tattoo gun. The gun can be used to place the tattoos anywhere on Barbie, on Barbie's clothes, or on the kids themselves.

The tattoos, of butterflies and stuff, are temporary and wash off.

It's just so easy to see why people would be alarmed.

One reaction that hasn't been heard is that Mattel has a long history of keeping Barbie current. She moves with the times, and the accessories she comes with reflect those times. That could be why Barbie has been around for so long.

But that's hardly the stuff of television newsworthiness. Too sensible.
cnn.com, news.sky.com


79
Vote
   


The consumer fights back

January 28th 2009 00:51
Dear Sir/Madam,

My rather expensive Vax vacuum cleaner has a problem and I would like to find a Vax service agent in Melbourne to fix it. This is proving unexpectedly difficult


[ Click here to read more ]
35
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

8318 Vote(s)
710 Comment(s)
97 Post(s)
515 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
7 Post(s)
2534 Vote(s)
28 Comment(s)
25 Post(s)
3799 Vote(s)
189 Comment(s)
56 Post(s)
2809 Vote(s)
172 Comment(s)
34 Post(s)
10315 Vote(s)
788 Comment(s)
157 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]