Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Government spending

August 11th 1999 11:02
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, competent people, on a level with dentists, that would be splendid! -- John Maynard Keynes


A bureacrat and his money

If someone could explain the economic principles behind Malaysian government spending at the moment, please call me.

According to axioms expound­ed at the London School of Economics, a pub next to which I frequented for many years, the way out of a recession is to spend money. Govern­ments need to lead the way by allocating more funding for highways, technology parks and public toilet blocks.

So far so good, because that in fact is just what the Malaysian government has done, ladelling sacks-full of capital into the coffers of all government depart­ments and telling them to throw it about quick smart.

Which is exactly what they are not do­ing.

Official figures show that the govern­ment spent just 5.3% of its devel­op­ment expenditure allocation in 1Q99. Put another way, all levels of government have been given RM16bn to play with in 1999. In the first three months, they spent just RM900m of it.

Some may point to the first quarter traditionally being a slow one for spend­ing, but 1Q99 spending was 25.6% less than 1Q98 spending. Meanwhile, the economy contracted 1.3% in the quarter.


This is not new news, of course. We first wrote about it in these columns in mid-May. In case you missed it, Prime Minister Mahathir was reportedly ‘upset’ with the bureaucrats. He even called them tight-fisted. As far as an excuse for the crazy situation, he blamed ‘red tape’.
He didn’t mention that much of the government spending that did actually occur in the first quarter was ‘emoluments’ – a series of one-off cash payments to public servants and other groups which of course have nothing to do with the forthcoming national election.
We expect GNP growth of 2.7% in 2Q99, followed by 6.1% and 5.8% in the third and fourth quarters, giving 3.3% for the full year. It’s a rosy scenario far removed from the gloom of 12 months ago. And it will be achieved despite, rather than because of, goverment spend­ing.
30
Vote
   


Chinese embassy bombing

May 18th 1999 09:54
I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, and in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.


Major cities in China have seen their biggest and angriest demonstrations for years in response to the destruction by Nato bombs of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade with the loss of four lives. Hundreds of students chanting anti-American and anti-Nato slogans marched in Shanghai, Chengdu and Guanghzou. In Beijing about 100,000 people invaded the embassy district, massing on streets littered with rocks and broken bottles from earlier protests. -- British Broadcasting Corporation, May 9, 1999

After two days of varied official accounts, the least credible explanation for Friday night's NATO bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade is that it was a pure accident. On Sunday, a US official in Washington told news agencies that the CIA had simply supplied inaccurate information, wrongly identifying the embassy as a Yugoslav weapons warehouse. It was the fourth version of events produced within several hours. -- www.wsws.org, May 10, 1999

Chinese protests Belgrade embassy bombing
A personal message for President Clinton in 1999 after the NATO bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade resulted in four dead
Picture: BBC

A few sage words for President Pickle

US President Bill Clinton called a top secret meeting in the White House steam room late last week where he told the assembled interns that he was gravely concerned at the recent lack of com­mentary from Red Inque.

Sorry about that, Bill. We’ve been very busy crying over the rise and rise of the stock market, which we missed, but we will now turn our attention to international affairs.

The leader of the world’s most power­ful nation has got himself into a pickle. Again. Although it is not clear at this stage whether public opinion rates a mention in Oval Office dialogue, we would point out that just about nobody any longer has a good word to say about American cartography.

We’re sorry to have to break this to you, Bill, but the people here in China are pretty upset with you. Some of them weren’t quite convinced by your explan­ation, and pictures of you writing a letter of apology didn’t really compete with pictures of the Chinese embassy dead arriving back home.

Meanwhile, you‘ve thrown the worms amongst Pandora’s pigeons when it comes to China’s entry to the WTO. It’s almost funny really – there are powerful factions within China lobbying both for and against WTO membership, and America’s double-bogey bombing has given both of them ammunition, so to speak. The conservatives in Beijing have become increasingly strident in their claims that China is selling its interests short in pushing for early WTO entry. Their outbursts are more often than not directed at Moftec, the senior govern­ment trade organisation which has overall responsibility for WTO negotiat­ions. It was perhaps therefore not surpris­ing that Moftec was amongst the first to get stuck into Nato, scoring some patriotic brownie points and thereby eas­ing the pressure of criticism.

We see you nodding. They might be burning your picture, Bill, but as a fellow professional we’re sure you respect a nifty bit of political dualism.

Try not to feel too guilty, but another consequence of your crappy mappies is that people around here are suddenly very nervous about China stocks. The biggest concern is the myriad companies which will receive no direct benefits from WTO entry but whose prices have risen recently on generally bullish WTO trading sentiment.

We are telling people, however, that these should not be confused with major players whose current share prices are well justified by their fundamentals, about which we remain positive and which represent good buying value on current weakness. These stocks include COSCO Pacific, China Mer­chants, Shanghai Ind­ustrial, Beijing Enter­prises, Zhejiang Expressway and Shen­zhen Expressway.

We suggest you target some of these, Bill. You can’t miss.
29
Vote
   


Indonesia’s lonely battle

November 16th 1998 02:53
Expendable pawns and few mates

I lived in Hong Kong for 16 years until 2007. In 1998 and 1999 I wrote a series of political, investment and social commentaries for a quirky institutional newsletter - quirky in that it was intended to be as much contentious, offbeat and humorous as it was informative. I was working as an editor, and I wrote the articles under the pseudonym Red Inque. I post them here for anyone interested in a look at life in Asia at the time, especially in Hong Kong just after its return to Chinese sovereignty.

Red Inque has a chess software package on his home computer which is notable for being free, for not playing at a very high standard, and for thrashing him mercilessly. When it comes to chess, Inque stinks. For some unfathomable reason, the programme’s designers decided to call it Gnu, and I keep track of our games in an Excel file named Me ‘n’ Gnu.
While I was playing a few games on Friday night, 14 people died on the streets of Jakarta, shot dead by soldiers who didn’t like what they were doing, which was calling for democratic reform.

If the previous sentence was a bit of a mind flip, and shockingly callous along with it, it was meant to be. It is an allegory for the way the rest of the world, the rest of Asia, and even Indonesia’s ASEAN partners, will react with indifference. Leaving out the social and philosophical implications, which are matters for wiser heads than this one, it will be business as usual come Monday. There will be no plummeting stock prices, at least not because of things Indonesian, when Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo open today; even more apathetic will be the markets in Sydney, London and New York.

Indonesia is alone at the moment. The international community just does not care, certainly not in the way, say, that there was dismay and genuine concern when things started going badly awry in Russia. And while the IMF has not exactly turned its back, there are no white knights to broker a Mexico-style quick turnaround.

Some years ago, a free-thinking Western politician suggested that India and Indonesia, the world’s second and fifth most populated nations, should be invited to join the UN Security Council, at one stroke broadening that chamber’s scope of thinking and enfranchising the Third World. Suharto was in power, of course, but perhaps despotism was a little more acceptable in the years when it was a little more common. Suharto hardly ranks with Idi Amin and Nicolae Ceaucescu in the pure evil stakes, but the 32-year history of Suharto Family Inc is a history of the worst sort of rapacity, bleeding his country and leaving his countrymen to grovel.

It is the sons and daughters of Suharto’s victims, of course, who are now taking to the streets, dodging bullets and demanding change. It is grimly ironic that the riots have been sparked by a special meeting of parliament which is discussing change. According to the legislators, it is far-reaching democratic reform which will make a freer and better Indonesia. According to the students, it is far too little and, so long as it refuses to remove the military from holding parliamentary seats, it is bollocks.

Here’s a bit of fanciful thinking. What if Bill Clinton, having got Saddam organised for the moment, changed his mind and decided to come to the APEC meeting in Kuala Lumpur after all. Once there, he starts thinking along the lines that he could score some brownie points in the Muslim world by holding out a helping hand to Indonesia. Not everyone may be happy with the pace or the agenda, but President Habibie is undoubtedly heading in the direction of democracy. If we ignore Irian Jaya momentarily for a greater good, Indonesia has no major warts. A quick detour by Clinton from KL, where there is nothing interesting on the agenda anyway, to Jakarta, some words of en­courage­ment for the reform process, a quick billion or so aid package and a photo session with Habibie might calm things down wonderfully.
31
Vote
   


Chris Champion's Blogs

8342 Vote(s)
710 Comment(s)
97 Post(s)
2611 Vote(s)
28 Comment(s)
27 Post(s)
3843 Vote(s)
189 Comment(s)
57 Post(s)
2869 Vote(s)
173 Comment(s)
35 Post(s)
10404 Vote(s)
788 Comment(s)
158 Post(s)
Moderated by Chris Champion
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]